CBBS 2023 is soliciting original submissions on a wide range of Computational Biology and Biomedical Science, spanning both theoretical and practical research.

Types of Submissions

During the submission process, make sure to select one type of submissions from the following 2 options.

Submission Type	Description and Details
Full paper submission	Full paper submissions should be prepared in English (DOC) and formatted according to the formatting instructions in the paper template. Primary screening and peer review will be made. Peer-reviewed accepted and registered papers will be published in CBBS 2023 conference proceedings. For each accepted paper, at least one author must attend the conference and present the paper. Authors of all accepted papers must prepare a final version for publication, a poster presentation or a short video/live oral presentation.
Abstract submission	Abstract submissions should be prepared in English (DOC or PDF), including Title, Authors, Affiliation(s), Abstract and Keywords. Once approved by the conference committee, the extended abstract can be presented at the conference, but NOT published in proceedings.

Submission Methods

Prospective authors are advised to submit full paper/abstract via the Online Submission System. In case of a failure in use of the system, please directly send an email to info@iccbbs.org, indicating telephone number and Submission Type.

Publishing Ethics for Authors

Authors are committed to the following ethical standards and instructions, in compliance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

• Originality, Plagiarism and Multiple Submission Declare that they have written entirely original works and appropriately cited or quoted the work and/or words of others, and that the manuscript is not published elsewhere, nor under consideration for publication elsewhere.
• Authorship Check all co-authors meet criteria for authorship and ensure appropriate acknowledgements made in the manuscript.
• Conflicts of Interest Authors should disclose any conflicts of interest that may influence the findings or the interpretation of the article to the editors as soon as possible.
• Availability and Accessibility of Research Data Authors should indicate in the submitted article where the data and the scripts for analyses are available and accessible.
• Fundamental Errors in Published Articles Inform the publisher if author subsequently find errors in their research.
  More in-depth or specific information on ethics can be found at https://publicationethics.org/.

Peer Review Process

All paper submissions will be peer reviewed by at least 2-3 anonymous reviewers (Double-Blind Peer-Review) based on their novelty, technical quality, potential impact, insightfulness, depth, clarity, and reproducibility.

Workflow

Step 1.	To keep scientific integrity, one of our editors will check if it has potential problem of plagiarism. Papers not passing the plagiarism check will be desk rejected immediately.
Step 2.	Then the editor will conduct initial check to ensure the submission falls within the scope of the conference and decide if it merits further review in 1-2 working days after submission. Once passed the initial check, the manuscript will be assigned to reviewers for double-blind peer review.
Step 3.	Each selected submission will be reviewed by at least two or three independent expert reviewers in the field on originality, validity, quality and academic merit, and readability.
Step 4.	The peer review reports received from the experts will be judged by the editor with international scientific standards.
Step 5.	The logical and valid peer review reports will be sent to the authors for them to revise the manuscript accordingly. For invalid reports, the editor may either assign a new reviewer or make a judgement based on his/her own.
Step 6.	Authors are required to respond to the peer review comments in details and revise their paper according to the points raised.
Step 7.	The revised manuscript will then be evaluated by the editor whether the points raised by the reviewers have been fully addressed or not.
Step 8.	Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation.
Step 9.	If the reviewers approve the revised version of the manuscript, then the Editor-in-Chief will make a final decision on acceptance for the publication.

Note

All submitted articles should report original research results, experimental or theoretical, not previously published or under consideration for publication elsewhere. Articles submitted to the conference should meet these criteria. We firmly believe that ethical conduct is the most essential virtue of any academics. Hence, any act of plagiarism or other misconduct is totally unacceptable and cannot be tolerated.